08-10-2012 01:37 AM
Babiker Babiker Faisal
This issue is not new to the arenas of Islamic thought, but new about it is that Al-Azhar awarded a doctorate with distinction in law and law of Sheikh Mustafa Mohammed Rashid for his thesis that dealt with the veil from the perspective of jurisprudence, where the study concluded that the veil is usually not obligatory Islamic.
Sheikh Rashid said in his letter to that (the interpretation of the verses in isolation from the historical circumstances and reasons for descent led to confusion and common misconception about the veiling of women in Islam is intended to cover the head which did not mention the word in the Koran at all).
I consider that (some commentators rejected the realization of the mind and Aguetpsoa religious texts in other location, and that every one of them explained either on the desires away from the significance of the real, or a lack of analytical capacity with the result of the scourge of psychology. Reason for this is due to disabling diligence Although the industrious receive good from God, even if wrong).
This view was the view by many Muslim intellectuals such as Professor Mahmoud Mohamed Taha, and Imam al-Sadiq al-Mahdi and Hassan al-Turabi, and Justice Mohamed Said Ashmawi, and Mr. Jamal Al-Banna.
The term hijab or veil did not exist in the Qur'an and the Sunnah of peremptory same meaning as intended by the advocates of women's obligation to wear hijab, hijab language means curtain or wall, and the verse which states the term veil is verse 53 of Sura parties (O ye who believe, do not enter houses of the Prophet but the authorized you to the food is beholding his self, but if you were called Vadkhaluaama Otaemtem ended, then disperse and Mstansen for an interview that it was hurting the Prophet Fasthi you, and God is not ashamed of the truth and if Saltamohen baggage, ask them from behind a screen, that is purer for your hearts and their hearts and what was you that Tazu Messenger of Allah nor that marry spouses after him, that never was with God. That is great).
This verse is not talking about clothing or uniforms given even talk on the status of cover between women of the Prophet and the companions only, and even the curtain is not required to place it between the companions and possessed the right of the apostle of the "slaves" or even daughters of the Apostle, or believers in general, and only the verse spoke of " women of the believers. "
And we say to such as this went, Dr. Ahmed Al-Ghamdi Director-General of the branches of the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, who said in an interview shortly before Al-Arabiya that the verses of hijab was revealed in the mothers of the believers are not responsible for Muslim women.
The verse 31 of Surat Al-Nur (Say to the believing women to lower their gaze and his sisters vaginally do not reveal their adornment only that which is apparent and stamp their necks on the bosoms and not to show off their adornment except to Bauhin, or their fathers or fathers of their husbands or their sons or the sons of their husbands, brothers or sons, or children of their sisters or their women or those whom their faith or non-affiliated primary Alarbh of men or children who have no sense of women's sins not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment and repent to Allah all, O believers, that ye may prosper).
The cause of the descent of the above verse is that the silks of Muslim women were giving birth "Alokhmrh" on their heads and behind their backs Asdlnha revealing of Sacrifice (upper chest) and neck. Verse has ordered women Bassadol veil to cover the front pockets (opening the chest). And not in the verse is a woman wearing a costume veil his name.
The verse Galabeyas a verse 59 of Sura parties (O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the believing women, ask them from behind a screen so inferior that they know so do not disturb) cause of descent is that women at that time (silks and slaves) were going detectors faces to spend their need in the open because there were not toilets or toilets in the houses, and some men go to the camera's on them while on their need and taught the Prophet that came down verse to order the women (Silks) distinguishing themselves from (slave) Badina Galabeyas on their faces so as not to subject them to these men fools.
There is no agreement or consensus on the meaning of the Robes and Adinah meaning contained in the verse. Al-Nawawi said in Sharh Muslim or gift in an interview in the Eid prayer: one of us does not have a robe .. Etc.. Said: Nadr bin Shamil: jilbab dress shorter and wider than the veil, a convincing cover of her head, and was told the dress and wide without a robe covering its back and chest, and was told he Kalmlah and Almlhfah, and was told is Mizar and said muffler.
Cause if from Adina Galabeyas is the distinction between the free woman and ongoing so as not to hurt the Muslim Free chaste of the camera men by understanding - no men - when they see convincing not dare to look at her when she was making its need while there is no harm in looking at the nation (not free), So the caliph Omar ongoing strike "Tguenat" condemned any jilbab Michbhh women silks.
According to the circumstances of the times in which we live no longer the illness of Adina Galabeyas the absence of my neighborhood, and the servants at the moment where he was the abolition of slavery and became a practice of inhuman're fighting the laws, and thus negated the sentence in accordance with rule jurisprudence "the reason that spin in the offering night and the presence or nothing ', if still the illness home with them offering night ".
Who say to compel women to observe hijab disagree that women should cover the whole body (the veil) or show the face and hands in both cases they are not resorting to the Qur'an, but talk to a number of Sundays.
Most famous of these conversations is the report narrated by Abu Dawood narrated from 'Aa'ishah that the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him, said of the names (names that you reached menstruation if a woman does not fix them to see anything but this and this, and pointed to his face and hands). As well as the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet said (two kinds of people of Hell have not seen. People with whips like the tails of cattle with which to beat people. And scantily dressed women, Mmellat gait, their heads like divination slash, do not enter Paradise, nor even smell its fragrance. Though its fragrance is to be found from the march such and such).
But there is another newly reported in Sahih Al-Bukhari in the door of ablution 'Abd-Allaah ibn' Umar says: (The men and women in Atodion time of the Prophet peace be upon him all). And in the other report (the men and women in Atodún time of the Prophet peace be upon him in the pot one-all).
There is also narrated by a modern (or boys Aljhenneh) Khawla girl Ansaryeh measured and reported in Saheeh Abi Dawood, that said (Lloyd differed hands of the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him in wudoo of one vessel).
The receipt of the word "all" in the hadeeth of 'Abd Allah ibn' Umar meant that women were Atodon with men, and is well known that in wudoo detection of the arm and face and hair. It costs some in a modern interpretation by saying that the men were Atodion separately, and women separately, or that the men were Atodion and go and then come women, but the words "from one pot" and "all" Tdhoudan these two interpretations, because everyone in the language against the junction. As the difference by Khawla Ansaryeh with a hand Apostle affirms that they were Atodion at the same time. And all this is in conflict with the obligation to invite women to observe hijab.
Al-Azhar's decision to grant doctoral degrees par excellence of Sheikh Mustafa bias implies that the major Islamic institution for the view that the hijab in its origin is normally not a religious duty and worship.
boulkea@yahoo.com
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento